“If you inherently long for something, become it first. If you want gardens, become the gardener. If you want love, embody love. If you want mental stimulation, change the conversation. If you want peace, exude calmness. If you want to fill your world with artists, begin to paint. If you want to be valued, respect your own time. If you want to live ecstatically, find the ecstasy within yourself. This is how to draw it in, day by day, inch by inch.”
Victoria Erickson
It would be many years before I began to understand that all of life is practice: writing, driving, hiking, brushing teeth, packing lunch boxes, making beds, cooking dinner, making love, walking dogs, even sleeping. We are always practicing.
Summary:
USA might block an undersea cable, going directly from L.A. to Hong Kong, from being built.
Passive word construction so let’s break down the details…
Whose undersea cable?
Dr. Peng Telecom and Media Group Co., which is the fourth biggest telecom operator in China, and also those key players we hear about all the time… Google and Facebook, Inc.
Together this is called the Pacific Light Network or the Pacific Light Data Communication Co.
Why would Pacific Light build this?
Demands for great data capacity.
This group wants more more more
-bandwidth in Asia
-& links to markets
in the Philippines
in Malaysia
in Indonesia
and, of course, more links to markets in Mainland China.
What do we call the opposition?
Team Telecom, made up of a panel of USA Representatives from the US Department of Homeland Security, approves or rejects applications for cable projects such as this international undersea cable project.
Why would Team Telecom reject Pacific Light’s undersea cable license application?
On the grounds of national security.
To signal a tougher stance on USA-China projects.
Growing distrust of Chinese ambitions (phrased as such by WSJ).
And what if rejection happens?
Well, data will move outside USA jurisdiction and still find its own way through other cables..
“PEOPLE TELL YOU WHO THEY ARE BUT WE IGNORE IT BECAUSE WE WANT THEM TO BE WHO WE WANT THEM TO BE.”
“MAKE IT SIMPLE AND SIGNIFICANT.”
“I DON’T BELIEVE IN FATE. I CREATE MY OWN OPPORTUNITIES.”
“IF YOU DON’T LIKE WHAT’S BEING SAID, CHANGE THE CONVERSATION.”
“YOU’RE GOOD. GET BETTER. STOP ASKING FOR THINGS.”
This is from James Altucher’s article here.
I came home to a cat, her white paws delicately dancing past the typewriter, mine.
Tucked inside the typewriter was a sheet, long dead, with the words I wrote by hand:
“Place yourself in circumstances of want, and ask yourself, “is this what I fear?”
Cuba announces increase in wages as part of economic reform
by Associated Press Thursday, June 27th 2019
The beginning:
“Every Cuban has the right to a salary increase,” said Dariel Tejeda, a 28-year-old tour guide. “The country and all the state workers have needed this for a long time.”
and the end:
Ending the dual-currency system is expected to lead to the eventual removal of subsidies and bankruptcy of dozens, even hundreds of state enterprises and the loss of many thousands of public sector jobs. With lower or no subsidies, state companies would be forced to raise prices. For that reason, a state salary increase has long been seen as a key precursor to monetary unification in Cuba.
Do you live in the city?
Or are you from a rural area?
One person’s perspective on how where you live informs how you feel about guns.
Gun control is a political issue because America is a nation whose population is very split between rural and urban areas. Most other nations don’t have this kind of heterogeneity in their population – they are either mostly rural, or mostly urban.
As it happens, life experiences and environment relating directly to gun usage heavily influences opinions on guns.
It turns out that it’s not political affiliation that determines gun opinions, it’s whether you live in a rural area.
Pro-gun-control liberals who move into rural areas often end up owning guns and significantly softening their stance on guns once they gain experience with them.
About a hundred years ago, guns were not a political issue in the US. Most everyone owned a gun, or had a close family member who owned guns. Most people lived in rural areas. It was just a necessary tool because there were no police nearby and sometimes you had problems with wild animals. You were on your own.
The lived-experience “facts” staring people in the face in each area vary wildly. In rural areas, of course you own guns. You need them. Of course they are dangerous – that’s the point: it’s a tool intended to make you dangerous against wild animals and occasional criminals.
None of that applies to the lived experience of living in the city.
In the city, the main thing you run into is other people. Some of them are occasionally annoying or have poor impulse control. You don’t need to shoot them, you just walk away. But if they have a gun, you might be in trouble.
Here are some excerpts from this excellent article on The Art of Decision Making.
In “War and Peace,” Tolstoy writes that, while an armchair general may imagine himself “analyzing some campaign on a map” and then issuing orders, a real general never finds himself at “the beginning of some event”; instead, he is perpetually situated in the middle of a series of events, each a link in an endless chain of causation.
“Can it be that I allowed Napolean to get as far as Moscow?” Tolstoy’s General Kutuzov wonders.
“When was it decided? Was it yesterday, when I sent Platov the order to retreat, or was it the evening before, when I dozed off and told Bennigsen to give the orders? Or still earlier?”
For Tolstoy, the tendency of big decisions to make themselves was one of the great mysteries of existence. It suggested that the stories we tell about our lives are inadequate to their real complexity.
We first ask ourselves what we value, then seek to maximize that value.
We choose how we change.
The problem is that you don’t actually want to listen to classical music. You want to want to. Aspiring, Callard thinks, is a common human activity.
If we couldn’t aspire to changes that we struggle to describe, we’d be trapped within the ideas that we already.
To aspire, Callard writes, is to judge one’s present-day self by the standards of a future self who doesn’t yet exist.
In the Chinese diet, milk and cheese, the well-recognized sources of calcium and phosphorus, are not used. A typical Chinese dish, which is called ‘sweet-sour-spareribs,’ was analyzed as a possible source of these elements.
From this research:
“Sweet-sour-spareribs” was often consumed by a woman after she gave birth.
The vinegar extracted huge amounts of calcium from the bones, giving the mother a much-needed source of calcium as she nursed her child.
From Marks Daily Apple
“A serious and good philosophical work could be entirely of jokes.”
— Ludwig Wittgenstein
The setup is that I think I know everything. The punchline is that I’m totally ignorant.
Seventy-five million deaths shocks my bones.
Why didn’t I learn this number, earlier? Why do I still know nothing about anything?
That one night in 1991 inflation rose prices of goods some 200%.
Economic collapse and inflation ensued.
But how would they afford to eat? Afford to pay rent?
People just like you and me lost their homes. Their life’s savings vanished into thin air as a byproduct of this man’s ambition.
Women and children begged for rubles or worked as prostitutes and a lucky man would be paid with 13 barrels of sunflower oil or with some another commodity.
Rampant
starvation and
death and
rented coffins
heroin from Afghanistan and East Asia
widespread alcoholism
I can only begin to comprehend the Russian people’s desire for stability. How could anybody forget that?
Excerpts below from the Nuclear Files Org.
13 February 1950
U.S.A., Pacific Ocean- A B-36 which developed serious mechanical difficulties on a simulated combat mission, dropped a nuclear weapon from 8,000 ft. over the Pacific Ocean before crashing.
Luckily only the weapon’s explosive material detonated.
Nothing is known of attempts to recover the nuclear weapon and presumably it is still in the ocean.
(The Defence Monitor Vol.X No.5 1981 Washington D.C. “The National Times” 15th March 1981)
1959: San Fernando Valley, California, U.S.A.
“Radioactive genes were slowly and deliberately released into the air after a serious accident in a reactor just north of the populous San Fernando Valley.”
(Sources “From under the Rug” F.O.E. La Trobe University Vic.)